From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Feb 26 09:28:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CC455BB0F for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dn48H1GLvz3JjK for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2B69E55B8AC; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B33555B7B0 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dn48H0h1Vz3Jg3 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0694F67 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 11Q9SEOL028267 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 11Q9SEOh028266 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253086] New Port: sysutils/nq: create queues of jobs which will run one at at time in the background of the shell Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tobik@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tobik@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:28:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253086 Tobias Kortkamp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |tobik@freebsd.org --- Comment #8 from Tobias Kortkamp --- (In reply to daniel.engberg.lists from comment #1) > The general solution for the other variables is to use ?=3D instead of =3D The most practical solution for that is to just override them in MAKE_ARGS instead of patching it. Sometimes that is not possible but here it is. The nq port already does this and it is what upstream wants as well as explained in https://github.com/leahneukirchen/nq/pull/20 (In reply to jsmith from comment #7) > The reason I forked upstream is the maintainer doesn't seem to > have done any work on nq in the past four years and has rejected any > porting/documentation pull requests. Ok, look... None of that seems to be true. If we discuss something like this can we try to do it on some kind of material basis. 1. nq is stable and simple. There is no reason why there would have been a lot of work on it. 2. The last release was in March 2018. That was ~3 years ago. 3. Leah is active elsewhere on GitHub. It is not like she disappeared for 3 years. 4. All new pull requests were done in the last 28 days and no reasonable time frame for merging them was given before forking. Actually all PRs have been merged or given good explanations as to why they have been rejected. There is no basis for forking and switching the package over to it. Anyway I'll take nq back now and bring in the kqueue patch which seems to be what this PR boils down to. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=