From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 3 15:42:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC783833 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from noop.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2001:470:8:162::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B63A8FC0C for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TfY9a-000Dhd-Th; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:41:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:41:54 -0500 From: Gary Palmer To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: looking for help from ppp users Message-ID: <20121203154154.GA20011@in-addr.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on noop.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:42:04 -0000 On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 06:19:25PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm working on a project to review the FAQ: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ThwackAFAQ > > I need volunteers to question through the questions starting "userppp" > through "desperation" and review them. If you don't have time to go > through them all, just pick one and make this a group process. > > Is it factually correct? > Does it use deprecated functionality? > Is it completely outdated to the point we should remove it? > Does it need better examples? > Is it clear and concise? > Typos and spelling mistakes > > It isn't that hard and would be a great help! While not commenting on the correctness of the current contents, the userland PPP section of the FAQ appears to mostly deal with dialup modems. I suspect more people use it now to do PPPoA or PPPoE for some form of DSL link and there probably needs to be some effort to address the differences. Regards, Gary