From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 25 12:17:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EDF9CA1; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [78.47.75.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC640296; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ftWXh5FcZzFTBB; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:11:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from winston.madpilot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5B9344HKTYDV; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:11:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:11:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53317282.9050601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:11:46 +0100 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r349108 - head/security/gnupg1 References: <201403250724.s2P7OggQ052655@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:17:09 -0000 On 03/25/14 10:36, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 25 mars 2014 07:24:42 +0000 Guido Falsi wrote: > | PORTVERSION= 1.4.16 > | -#PORTREVISION= 1 > | CATEGORIES= security > > Did you maybe mean to uncomment it ? > Because I think it does require a PORTREVISION bump. > You are right. I forgot that. Fixing this. Thanks. -- Guido Falsi