Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:54:33 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: "Arno J. Klaassen" <arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export Message-ID: <20091028175433.GA1671@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <wpbpjtwwg7.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> References: <wpbpjtwwg7.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:00AM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > Hello, > > I googled a bit on this question but could not find > a clear answer : > > is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting > a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old > way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off? > > I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly > linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow > am a bit waterfearing changing the nfsčoptions which worked > great till now. You can safely use /etc/exports without touching sharenfs property. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFK6IVZForvXbEpPzQRAqVPAJkB5FeDxQwhxGdst8ZmO6R2/PEBCQCfQpoz EskaPcrzoAlTe+MxDPrNkO0= =Gb2R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091028175433.GA1671>