Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:58:31 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 255072] boot (legacy): no progress beyond 'BIOS DRIVE D: is disk1'
Message-ID:  <bug-255072-99-SM5KW513v1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-255072-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-255072-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255072

--- Comment #35 from spell@itl.ua ---
(In reply to Toomas Soome from comment #30)
>If the INT call will actually use more of that memory, then we may be in=20
>trouble. I guess the only way to detect how much buffer memory was actuall=
y=20
>used, can be detected by storing know value into entire buffer, and test=20
>how big are it is where the buffer is changed.

Can't implement this test because bd_edd_io() does not return (the crash oc=
curs
inside of it), so I can't check the buffer state after this crashing INT.
Is there any way to look into the INT of itself?

>did you see comment in bd_io()?
>It is about proliant and large disk
Can you please explain what a buffer overrun happens on that Proliant and h=
ow
does bd_io_workaround() solve the poblem and whether it just alleviates (as
said in the comment) or totally excludes the buffer overrun?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255072-99-SM5KW513v1>