From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 16:10:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FC037B401 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13C743F85 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paulbeard@mac.com) Received: from webmail01.mac.com (webmail01-en1 [10.13.11.143]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h6ANAQgi005811; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail01 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail01.mac.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h6ANAQ9k023964; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3367553.1057878626030.JavaMail.paulbeard@mac.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:10:26 -0700 From: Paul Beard To: John Mills Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Post about BSD's alleged demise on /. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:10:28 -0000 On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 04:06PM, John Mills wrote: >Freebies - > >In fact there was an editorial suggestion in a recent _eWeek_ >(should be [http://www.eweek.com], but I can't confirm that just now.) >to the point that managers concerned about SCO's litigation should >actively test and evaluate the *BSD family, specifically mentioning >FreeBSD's excellent reputation for server quality. Chad Dickerson, the CTO of InfoWorld, made that suggestion in his weblog a couple of weeks back (possibly that's where you saw it?): I've been at him for awhile to upgrade to FreeBSD. -- Paul Beard / 8040 27th Ave NE / Seattle WA 98115 / paulbeard [at] mac [ dot] com / 206 529 8400 weblog @