Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:26:58 +0200 From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Change of makedev() semantics. Message-ID: <200401270926.58924.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <88290.1075184847@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <88290.1075184847@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 08:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <653.1064784127@critter.freebsd.dk>, Poul-Henning Kamp=20
writes:
> >I am in the process of adding ref-counting and locking to dev_t,
> >and would very much prefer if we could get this step completed
> >soon before 5-STABLE gets branched.
>
> Sure I did write this, several months ago. Could whoever has a
> mailloop fix it ?
=46rom what I have seen, both here and on ports@, is that hub.freebsd.org=20
held on to some mails for 6-8 weeks before handing them on to the next=20
box for distribution.
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9D14F16A4E7; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A81216A4B3
for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 06:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Lots and lots of occurrences like that in the mails.
Internal FreeBSD problem this time, it seems.
=2D-=20
Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk
| tap@kde.org
"In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org
we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401270926.58924.andy>