From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 24 14:41:28 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996CE16A403
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org)
Received: from mail08b.verio.de (mail08b.verio.de [213.198.55.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB7D43DB2
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:41:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org)
Received: from mx81.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.152)
	by mail08b.verio.de (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 1-017401851;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:41:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from www.jennejohn.org [213.198.5.174] (EHLO peedub.jennejohn.org)
	by mx81.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id
	8a52e354.4228.184.mx81.stngva01.us.mxservers.net; 
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.13.8/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k9OEeRv4002331;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:40:27 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org)
Message-Id: <200610241440.k9OEeRv4002331@peedub.jennejohn.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:09:42 +0200."
	<ehl3am$me3$1@sea.gmane.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:40:27 +0200
From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org>
X-Spam: [F=0.0263360148; heur=0.500(-9900); stat=0.026;
	spamtraq-heur=0.500(2006102404)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <garyj@jennejohn.org>
X-SOURCE-IP: [213.198.5.174]
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-DistLoop-Detect: 1
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: scheduler CORE for RELENG_6 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org>
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:41:28 -0000

Ivan Voras writes:
> Gary Jenneohn wrote:
> 
> > Really? I've been using it since it was introduced and find it to be quite
> > good on my dual-core AMD64 machine running in i386 mode.
> 
> Any benchmarks, or description of what's improved? :)
> 

No. I can only say that it doesn't "feel" any worse than SCHED_4BSD to me.
Totally subjective, of course.

---
Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyjATdenxDOTde