From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Apr 15 14:41:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3425637B416 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.feral.com (mjacob@mailhost.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g3FLfQf63393 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:41:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:41:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@beppo Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: is there a reason that da should *not* drive type STORAGE ARRAY Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Whilst dorking with an HP XP-512 storage arrage array on Fibre Channel, I found that it defaults to type STORAGE ARRAY (not DIRECT ACCESS). However, the DIRECT ACCESS commands work fine. Is there a reason why da(4) should *not* drive devices of type STORAGE ARRAY? -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message