From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 8 1: 8:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A6B14F10 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 01:08:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-01.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.1]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA50243; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 01:08:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id BAA82875; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 01:08:05 -0800 (PST) To: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" Cc: "R. Imura" , andrews@technologist.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible change in the Qt port. References: <38209354.5A0E1416@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <3.0.6.32.19991103230433.008afc90@mail.psn.net> <19991106044140H.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <3825A24F.A98124BC@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 08 Nov 1999 01:08:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni"'s message of "Sun, 07 Nov 1999 11:01:19 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" * There is a binary: moc, AFAIK it's onlt used during the building process * in some ports and they expect to find it in $(QTDIR)/bin. Is it a problem to tell those ports that QTDIR=${PREFIX} ? * Not really; we already use this approach when the port wants to create * it's own directory. The example that comes to mind is Scilab. Lesstif is * a case where NOT applying this is clearly violating hier(). Just because the rule isn't enforced in all cases doesn't make the rule invalid. :) -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message