From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 22 03:31:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F64216A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:31:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao05.cox.net (lakermmtao05.cox.net [68.230.240.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65EB43D5F for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:31:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20041122033146.EAGB2595.lakermmtao05.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:31:46 -0500 To: "Edwin Groothuis" References: <41A01DF9.9090607@sc.rr.com> <20041121205219.GA1154@dragon.nuxi.com> <20041122020040.GA12663@dragon.nuxi.com> <200411220327.31085.freebsd@redesjm.local> <20041122032927.GA1214@k7.mavetju> Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:32:30 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041122032927.GA1214@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Linux, build 751) cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: vim-lite-6.3.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:31:47 -0000 On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:29:28 +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:06:40PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:27:30 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez >> wrote: >> >> >El Lunes, 22 de Noviembre de 2004 03:00, David O'Brien escribi??: >> >>On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:52:19PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:41:14PM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >> >>> > El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 18:27, David O'Brien >> >>> > escribi?: >> >>> > >> >>> > cp> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:06:27AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> >>> > > > William Allison p??e v so 20. 11. 2004 v 23:47 -0500: >> >>> > > > > I'm sorry but I can't seem to figure this out and haven't >> >>> > > > > been able to get help on IRC. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > [ ... ] >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I would more than welcome a patch for a tested vim-gtk (or >> >>> > > vim-gtk2) slave port[*] that I could review and test. >> >>> > >> >>> > I use this locally for weeks >> >>> >> >>> This isn't a slave port. See vim-lite for an example of what I >> >>> mean. Also your patch un-portlint's the Makefile more than it >> >>> already is. >> >> >> >>Why isn't the following suffient for a GTK slave port? >> > >> >I just prefer fix what I really want. >> >> It's personal matter, I will not want to have Perl, cscope and etc in >> GTK >> slave port if it creates. >> >> >WITH_GTK2=yes >> >WITH_I18N=yes # localized menus and messages >> >WITH_CSCOPE=yes # cscope support >> >WITH_PERL=yes # perl integration >> > >> >So this can be build as package even with only BATCH=yes. >> >> Solution add this in your make.conf: >> ========================================= >> .if ${.CURDIR:M*/editors/vim} >> WITH_GTK2=yes >> WITH_I18N=yes # localized menus and messages >> WITH_CSCOPE=yes # cscope support >> WITH_PERL=yes >> .endif >> ========================================= > > Or let the port use OPTIONS and you have a more scalable way of > configuring these options. OPTIONS is the last thing that I will want to touch. It doesn't solve problem. Cheers, Mezz > Edwin -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org