From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 12 15:54:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E4837B417 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:54:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 8AF1C9B19; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:54:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:54:12 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: The Anarcat Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making bento recognize dual-packages pors (Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cvsup-without-gui Makefile) Message-ID: <20020112185412.S73815@squall.waterspout.com> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: The Anarcat , ports@freebsd.org References: <200201121943.g0CJhWQ26234@freefall.freebsd.org> <200201122105.g0CL5lQ85471@aldan.algebra.com> <20020112221028.GA1233@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020112221028.GA1233@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 05:10:28PM -0500, The Anarcat wrote: > We have a recurring problem here. > > It's the same one as GNOME. Some ports do not *require* those > functionalities, but one can add them as enhancements. > > Bento should be able to recognize such ports and build them with *and* > without the additional functionality. > > Actually, such macros are already available. We have WANT_GNOME, we > could instate WANT_X11. Then bento (or whichever package builder) would > build 2 versions of the ports (WITHOUT_X11 and no flags). Patches, please. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message