From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 23 23:52:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA01837 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 23:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ra.dkuug.dk (ra.dkuug.dk [193.88.44.193]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA01804 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 23:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by ra.dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA02448; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:51:15 +0200 Message-Id: <199609240651.IAA02448@ra.dkuug.dk> Subject: Re: Linux ELF crossdev on -current? To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:51:15 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199609240429.NAA28568@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Sep 24, 96 01:59:24 pm From: sos@FreeBSD.org Reply-to: sos@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Michael Smith who wrote: > > > Ok all you lurking multiplatformers, I have a pretty straightforward > question for you. 8) > > Fairly soon, one of the pieces of software that we use is going to be > moving to using FLEXlm (it's a linux binary, but that's neither here nor > there). > > In anticipation of this, I've contacted Globetrotter and am in posession of > the current FLEXlm evaluation kit. > > What has me stumped just now is that to test the demo I have to build a > vendor daemon (ignore the jargon); ie. I need to build a Linux ELF binary. > > Is anyone else doing this under 2.1.x or 2.2? Care to share a few words of > wisdom? I did this when I did the Linux ELF emu stuff, I had the development system from slackware installed /compat/linux/.. You should be carefull to "trim" your makefile (or the gcc spec file) so that you pick up the right includefiles & libraries. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Soren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team So much code to hack -- so little time.