From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct 27 10: 9:12 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6CC4814A15; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id TAA02104;
	Wed, 27 Oct 1999 19:08:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <199910271708.TAA02104@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910272118130.390-101000@localhost.cgu.chel.su> from Ilia Chipitsine at "Oct 27, 1999 09:33:20 pm"
To: ilia@cgilh.chel.su (Ilia Chipitsine)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 19:08:47 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
> 
> FreeBSD-3.3 + softupdates + "# tunefs -o time" + "flags 0xb0ffb0ff"
>           (kernel was compiled with "-O2")

Hmm, if you didn't do a "tunefs -n enable" you are not using softupdates
and there is your reason why FreeBSD is slower..

-Søren



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message