From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 00:30:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7942216A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAF643D45 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout14/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7B0UBsH019844 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([133.11.172.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7B0U7iv015290 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:29:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050811.092956.74703209.chat95@mac.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050731120013.9D6D316A421@hub.freebsd.org> <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:30:12 -0000 In Message-ID: <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> dR wrote: > OO is not 64-bit clean, according to the responses > that I received when I've asked about OO here. No OpenOffiec.org is 64 bit clean, IIRC someone reported OOo 1.1 is working under GNU/Linux Alpha. Port for amd64 is progressing and builds and partially works. But most difficult part, cpp-uno bridge, is not ready (for GNU/Linux). Please refer Pavel Janik's blog for details. His blog is always informative and correct: http://blog.janik.cz/ We are always waiting for someone who are interested in amd64 porting. thanks! -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)