From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 09:11:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DFA15C58AF for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gal.iecc.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E662D8114A for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 93272 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2019 09:11:25 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=16c56.5d11e53d.k1906; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=8a6InKtS63UIHY8dGKe/PfNEbi+XprhBozmiif/Fii0=; b=N0Po72O7sEqC/KHSGzUpVJjWLkiFQkBLmalI17nsXm09tmgTDolEliEkm0fEgD4aA6PjHfj0xmTsgzEdV51f4F4Nw5OEaAW8pCQ1j43c0DYv5GGyxcqv2YKzIX7f5P3wArssUmPal6PFI8MU3UMMfw/2gOZlAL5yaDLTCqO02ZCZ+uHSpeNejmO6sksWub/bql+8HfBBvYhj7ikL9UPJz/u6bAcA3vRwd/tAq7LXgzzxJefww/72dE+PDU6mBztS Received: from ary.local ([199.91.196.51]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 25 Jun 2019 09:11:25 -0000 Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D01A82016427DB; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:11:23 +0100 (+01) Date: 25 Jun 2019 10:11:23 +0100 Message-Id: <20190625091123.D01A82016427DB@ary.local> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd@qeng-ho.org Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? In-Reply-To: <5dd4f68d-d99a-4ab7-a217-76b9fee372e7@qeng-ho.org> Organization: Taughannock Networks X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:11:28 -0000 In article <5dd4f68d-d99a-4ab7-a217-76b9fee372e7@qeng-ho.org>, Arthur Chance wrote: >> such as noexec on "untrusted user filesystems". With ZFS of course, >> this is all a lot easier, but with UFS, do people still use functional >> partitioning instead of "putting everything into one big / because >> that's how you do it today"? If you're worried about limiting disk usage in different file trees, you really should be using ZFS rather than fixed UFS partitions so you get finer control and can still use the whole disk. On small systems where I use UFS, /tmp is mfs and everything else is in one shared partition.