From owner-freebsd-smp Sun May 4 13:07:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA14009 for smp-outgoing; Sun, 4 May 1997 13:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA14004 for ; Sun, 4 May 1997 13:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from givry.inria.fr (givry.inria.fr [128.93.8.18]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA01074; Sun, 4 May 1997 22:07:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from givry.inria.fr (givry.inria.fr [128.93.8.18]) by givry.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA17582; Sun, 4 May 1997 22:07:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199705042007.WAA17582@givry.inria.fr> From: Francis Dupont To: Steve Passe cc: "John S. Dyson" , smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maptable of SuperMicro P6DNH In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 04 May 1997 13:54:29 MDT. <199705041954.NAA26777@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 22:07:16 +0200 Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In your previous mail you wrote: >I have a Supermicro P6DNH (biPPro board with 2 PCI (8 slots), i960, ...) > ... >the bipro test kernel but it hangs after the boot, I can do the tests >you'd like if you need more infos, including installing special system). I think you probably can run an SMP kernel if you are running 3.0-current and build it with "options SMP_TIMER_NC" in the kernel config file: => I'll try the 3.0-970502-SNAP tomorrow (it is 22h00 here and of course ftp.fr.freebsd.org (with a 34Mbits/s access) is down :-). According to the manual and/or actual BIOS actions, is it possible to choose from a range of IRQs for the secondary IDE controller? or do they claim your only choice is IRQ15? => I have the manual in an other building, I'll send the answer tommorrow. Regards Francis.Dupont@inria.fr PS: it seems to be a nice board (8 PCI slots are good because I do some research in networking (IPv6 & ATM) and I have some 10/100Mbits/s Ethernet (DE500), FDDI (DEFPA), ATM (Efficient) boards to put in) but I already had to change the place of the Adaptec because Windows NT 4.0 wanted to find it on the first PCI bus (FreeBSD didn't matter)...