From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 20 19:38:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF1416A421 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net (eastrmmtao102.cox.net [68.230.240.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD8713C4CE for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20071220193844.YLIN3253.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:38:44 -0500 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id T7eH1Y00N4iy4EG0000000; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:38:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:38:48 -0600 To: "Chuck Robey" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4769908E.5080008@chuckr.org> <476AA47A.9020108@chuckr.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <476AA47A.9020108@chuckr.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (Linux) Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-flashplayer running X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:38:45 -0000 On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:20:58 -0600, Chuck Robey wrot= e: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:43:42 -0600, Chuck Robey = >> wrote: >> >> Oh, I'm in trouble now. I was getting a bit frustrated, because all = the >> different names that my browsers hide under, and the fact that 2 othe= r >> items >> confuse things: >> >> 1) the config dirs aren't always named after the program, and >> >>> Please complain it to the developers that create this program. It = >>> wasn't >>> our idea. >> >> 2) the G_D_ ports often installed things into /usr/local/ even for li= nux >> things, and other times into /compat, and that terribly screws things= = >> up. >> >>> I don't know what 'G_D_ ports' is. > > Sorry, it's not my job to interpret, and it's rather small of you to = > think so > (LOL). > >> >> Why am I complaining? Because now, for Linux-firefox, I do have the >> flashplayer.9 working, but with all the screwing around I couldn't >> duplicate >> it. The problem was initially the flashplayer, because the version >> in ports >> no longer even exists. I went to the Adobe site, and just got the >> latest. >> Then, the version of libdl that Linux-firefox wants is not only = >> different >> thanthe version that the flashplayer wants, they (I think) aren't alw= ays >> looking in the same dir for it. >> >> Whatever, it CAN be done, because I did it. >> >> Boy, I wish that the portsmeisters would (once and for all, plublicly= ) >> decide >> that linux libs have to install into the /compat/linux tree. If they= >> would go >> on record for that, I would begin fixing ports to obey it. Can't do >> that now. >> >>> I see all Linux libraries that I have installed are in /compat/linux= /* >>> by ports tree. If it doesn't in your case, then please complain to t= he >>> right maintainer. > > Actually (and I have complained about it recently, but you must have = > missed > it) you assertion that all ports follow thatplacement rule is absolute= ly > false. How did you happen to come to that conclusion? Because you sa= w = > one do > that? Or, because you found some written rule, and you assumed it was= = > being > followed? You need to be at least a little more thorough in checking = the > truth, when making these statements, because it's being flouted by mor= e = > than > just a few Linux ports. I work with Linux ports a lot in the past. I did some help on linux-gtk2= , = linux-fontconfig or linux-freetype, acrobat and a few etc to test, repor= t = and suggest to tweak. Current, I am maintaining linux-opera and used to = = maintain linux-aspell. Put Linux libraries in /compat/linux makes sense = = and is correct way to me. # cd /usr/ports/textproc/linux-aspell/ # make -V PREFIX /compat/linux # cd ../../x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2/ # make -V PREFIX /compat/linux # cd ../../x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig/ # make -V PREFIX /compat/linux As you have pointed 'more ports', my suggest still stands by contact to = = the right maintainers and explain to them the reasons why put in = /compat/linux is best way to do. > Anyhow, what I was after was getting the folks who have the say so = > (those in > ports control, and also ports committers) to make a public decision th= at = > the > method of file layout i am asking for is in fact the only one that is > approved. Like I say in my post, if this were put into a post, I woul= d = > point > to it, when I get busy correcting various ports which currently do not= = > follow > that rule. I need the public support before I try to correct things. = = > I'm > willing to do the work, but not willing to fight the battle, so things= = > will > remain the way they are until I get a ruling on this. Ok, I am sure that most of us are looking forward for your patches. >>> Not single of your complains have to do with freebsd-multimedia@. > > Is implementing Flash on Linux-firefox a multimedia topic? I think so= , = > and if > this request isn't acted upon, sooner or later, things will not be = > improved > (at least not by me). I am just point you to contact to the correct maintainer to get better = result. A few of your emails don't get good result because you didn't = contact to the maintainers. If you send to multimedia@ plus CC maintaine= r = and I will silence. Q: With your #1 complain, what can we do when the developers decided to = = have different name of config? A: Nothing, all you can do is to request to the developers to see if the= y = can make changes. Q: With your #2 complain, how can non-maintainer can do? A: Nothing, all you can do is to contact to the maintainers and make som= e = request. There is rule that non-maintainer can't commit other ports = without permission. If they disagree, ask @freebsd-emulation to see if = they can help you to get maintainers' mind change. > I don't know why you're so angry, but I don't think anything *I* did i= s = > the cause. Nah, I am not angry. Don't know why you think that way. I am not very go= od = on English, so maybe it's why. Cheers, Mezz >>> Cheers, >>> Mezz >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHaqR6z62J6PPcoOkRAqm4AJ4gU/4CGsKO4n4QAnG2MT5fVPas1ACbBWx2 > 2WXLKBm/AeWr1e/60NTtr8Q=3D > =3D9pZn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org