From owner-freebsd-java Mon Aug 21 7:13: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ntua.gr (achilles.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D08037B422 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netmode.ece.ntua.gr (dolly.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.10]) by ntua.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12246 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:12:55 +0300 (EET DST) Received: by netmode.ece.ntua.gr (Postfix, from userid 410) id 6E45085C3; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:58:44 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:58:43 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas To: java@freebsd.org Subject: RE: JCK License implications (was: State of Server-Side Java) Message-ID: <20000821165843.A20089@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> Reply-To: past@netmode.ntua.gr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i X-Organizational-Unit: Network Management and Optimal Design Laboratory X-Organization: National Technical University of Athens, GREECE X-Work-Phone: +30-1-772-1-450 X-Work-FAX: +30-1-772-1-452 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If I understand things correctly, people with no access to the JCK can still send patches against patchset 10, and they will be incorporated by the porting team in the main tree. So for everyone else, but the porting team members (both of them :-)), the native port still IS patchset 10. This way things like native threads, etc., can still be community-developed and tested. The only thing missing will be the patches that the porting team members make, that provide JCK compliance. That's not too bad IMHO. -past To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message