From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 21:08:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BB816A4CF for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:08:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [217.77.141.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C7443D45 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:08:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i64L8o6V014509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 23:08:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host 152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14] claimed to be [192.168.1.104] Message-ID: <40E871D2.8040405@whacky.net> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 23:08:34 +0200 From: Stephan van Beerschoten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040703) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: n0g0013 References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86EBB@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <40E59559.8090907@cronyx.ru> <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> In-Reply-To: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on erg.verweg.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 21:08:57 -0000 n0g0013 wrote: >On 02.07-19:31, Brad Knowles wrote: >[ ... ] > > >> Yup. PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't >>ever get stolen or compromised. That makes it much harder for >>someone to successfully impersonate you. >> >> > >what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i >investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant >to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). > >does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt >won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently >won't verify the content). > > > Been there, done it, fixed it. Try the following recipe in your .procmailrc if you use procmail. If you don't, consider doing it ;) # Make old style PGP readable for Mutt: # :0 * !^Content-Type: message/ * !^Content-Type: multipart/ * !^Content-Type: application/pgp { :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- * ^-----END PGP MESSAGE----- | formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt" :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- * ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign" } :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- * ^-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- | formail -i "Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; format=text;" Have fun :)