From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 26 20:04:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4436416A525; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DECE44D49; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:42:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E511A3C19; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:42:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 877E051387; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:42:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:42:43 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: John Smith Message-ID: <20061126194243.GA76643@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:04:56 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote: > On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > >On 11/26/06, John Smith wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > > >The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > >you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and > >maybe take active maintainership of it. > > > >You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports > >will be met by a grinning "we told you so". > > >=20 > Thank you Andrew, >=20 > I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on > FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make > sure. That's unfortunate :( Kris --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFae4zWry0BWjoQKURAk5JAJ4rBCvpP/HOlDFTabth+b4e6n+BqQCdF0ha zfRfjJ5cQN9kjGkfmBGm7nY= =v0Q2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--