Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:17:23 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> Cc: "toolchain@freebsd.org" <toolchain@FreeBSD.org>, Pete chou <pete.chou@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Using non-standard linker Message-ID: <4292EBED-F73B-43E7-A496-5345462B0021@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <F28985E4-AFDE-4FB8-9DBE-9458610598BE@cederstrand.dk> References: <089FCDB5-C0D2-4675-AB71-FD7089BFA031@cederstrand.dk> <5880F938-A9EC-4B2D-8079-42504DFA87F9@FreeBSD.org> <5337BAB6-7EEE-4A1E-9660-902544CCE3EE@cederstrand.dk> <8450A192-367E-4577-97C5-114EDD094BD4@bsdimp.com> <F28985E4-AFDE-4FB8-9DBE-9458610598BE@cederstrand.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Dec 2012, at 08:15, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Would this be acceptable in FreeBSD if I created a patch, or are you = just suggesting it for my local testing? I think that we will probably want to import MCLinker as soon as it is = able to (correctly) link the base system, and at that point a patch is = probably a good idea. I'll try to ensure that there is infrastructure = in clang for selecting the linker by that time as well. David=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4292EBED-F73B-43E7-A496-5345462B0021>