From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Feb 23  7:16:43 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01349119ED
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:16:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA13116;
	Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:16:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA11127;
	Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:16:26 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:16:26 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com>
Cc: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: panic: zone: entry not free
Message-ID: <19990223161625.B10845@bitbox.follo.net>
References: <19990223094120.A97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <199902230909.MAA01169@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> <19990223105939.D97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i
In-Reply-To: <19990223105939.D97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com>; from Jos Backus on Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:59:39AM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 12:09:03PM +0300, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> > Inline functions in vm/vm_zone.h depend on INVARIANTS. These functions 
> > used in msdosfs and in other parts of the kernel.
> 
> OK, I see.
> 
> > > How does one add INVARIANTS support to modules?
> > 
> > You could add -DINVARIANTS to CFLAGS in sys/module/msdosfs/Makefile. 
> > You better just link msdosfs statically, or remove INVARIANTS from your 
> > kernel.
> 
> I'll try this tonight, thanks.
> 
> > That is, INVARIANTS in kernel incompatible with dynamic loading.
> 
> Somehow this strikes me as a Bad Thing...

It _is_ a bad thing.  I've been pondering what to do with the
intrusive invariant checks - make them dependent on
INTRUSIVE_INVARIANTS, perhaps?  That would still make some KLDs
incompatible with INTRUSIVE_INVARIANTS, but that is probably the best
we can do.

Eivind.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message