From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 04:59:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322E516A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:59:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D714943D48 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1208E1C000A6 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E31821C000A2 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:59:55 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050330045955930.E31821C000A2@mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:59:55 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <867833382.20050330065955@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1112144431.661.34.camel@orker.orbweavers.co.uk> References: <42480F8B.1060405@makeworld.com> <42496060.1060404@makeworld.com> <467487023.20050329162852@wanadoo.fr> <1651925454.20050329182327@wanadoo.fr> <1124238890.20050329231338@wanadoo.fr> <1112144431.661.34.camel@orker.orbweavers.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:59:57 -0000 Martin McCann writes: > So, you start by demanding your individual problem is resoloved by a > list who has no responsibility to the upkeep of the software that has > given you issue? I haven't demanded anything, I've simply asked. > You have repeated this time and time again. No-one is argueing with you. > I think it is safe to assume no-one knows excactly what the message is > about. Then why is guessing about the rest an accept method of troubleshooting? > Many people have tried to help by applying their high level of > knowledge to the situation, which you have lambasted. If they had a high level of knowledge, they would know what the messages meant. > There is reason to belive it. No, there is not. In order to have a reason to believe it, one would have to know what the messages meant, and nobody knows that. An outpouring of messages does not necessarily indicate a hardware malfunction. > Consider if you will the impression you might give to a future > employer who does a google search on your name. I have. -- Anthony