From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 16 05:25:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA12994 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 05:25:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from millennium.net (mrvid.demon.co.uk [194.222.140.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA12969 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 05:25:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@mrvid.demon.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by millennium.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA05556; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 17:45:39 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 17:45:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Lists X-Sender: lists@millennium.net To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" cc: Joe Mays , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Distributed Webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Joe Mays wrote: > > > What are the favored methods for running distributed > > load-balancing webservers here? > > How many hits per minute are you wanting? Is this for many virtual > sites, or another Yahoo! ? > > > Also, has anyone managed to come up with a good solution for > > sharing customer websites between NT and FreeBSD servers? > > Shoot the customer who wants to use NT - puts 'em out of your misery. I don't understand why a customer would need NT unless they needed Frontpage extensions, which 1. are crap and 2. are available on UN*X anyway! Any other reasons? L8rz KrOnUs