From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 17 14:51:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from priv-edtnes09-hme0.telusplanet.net (mtaout.telus.net [199.185.220.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B65837B50B; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from fireball ([209.52.193.31]) by priv-edtnes09-hme0.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.01 201-253-122-122-101-20011014) with SMTP id <20011217225103.FRAL28264.priv-edtnes09-hme0.telusplanet.net@fireball>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:51:03 -0700 Message-ID: <001301c1874d$50ae0d20$02000003@tornado> From: "Dave Reyenga" To: , Cc: Subject: Instead of JFS, why not a whole new FS? Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:50:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG How about writing a new filesystem based on UFS? This would save all of the hassle that JFS would bring: licensing, porting time, etc. Of course, it would likely bust any compatibility desired. What I'm thinking is a filesystem that takes the current UFS and improves upon it. It could support larger partitions, more partitions in a slice, and perhaps a "Journal" partition (like the current "swap" partition) among other new features. What do others have to say about this? Are there any major flaws in my idea? It just seems to me that this would cut a lot of hassle. Those are just my $0.02. I know I've said it before, but I wasn't nearly as clear last time. -Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message