From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Aug 1 10:44:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA01977 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lsmarso.dialup.access.net (lsmarso.dialup.access.net [166.84.254.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01967 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from lsmarso@localhost) by lsmarso.dialup.access.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA01954; Fri, 1 Aug 1997 13:40:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19970801134034.29334@panix.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 13:40:34 -0400 From: "Larry S. Marso" To: Michael Smith , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windows OT? (was Re: UNIX World Online) References: <199708010018.TAA17410@nexgen.hiwaay.net> <199708010141.LAA01297@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.79 In-Reply-To: <199708010141.LAA01297@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>; from Michael Smith on Fri, Aug 01, 1997 at 11:10:59AM +0930 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, Aug 01, 1997 at 11:10:59AM +0930, Michael Smith wrote: > > The OT could stand for Old Technology, Open Technology, or lots of other > > things. Everybody has brainstormed new and more appropriate definitions for > > NT at one time or another... :-) > > Oh dear. Before FreeBSD could be OT, it would have to be Clear. Hey, we > could have the first Clear OS! > > (Note, I am _not_ affiliated with the RTC, CoS or any similar organisation) FLAG? Sea Org? The Citizens Commission, perhaps? -- Larry S. Marso lsmarso@panix.com