From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 12 12:35:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE21A1065692; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smtp-out0.tiscali.nl (smtp-out0.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6573D8FC21; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.123.145.58] (helo=sjakie.klop.ws) by smtp-out0.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1NJRBc-0007Iu-AX; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:35:00 +0100 Received: from 82-170-177-25.ip.telfort.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sjakie.klop.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BE6151EF; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:34:42 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Doug Barton" , "Christoph Mallon" References: <200912102225.nBAMPrZx076758@svn.freebsd.org> <19235.10488.325168.267306@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <4B232E39.4000305@FreeBSD.org> <4B236147.7030603@gmx.de> <4B236403.2080408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:34:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4B236403.2080408@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (FreeBSD) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Hajimu UMEMOTO , Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: svn commit: r200369 - in head: etc share/termcap X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:35:01 -0000 On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:36:03 +0100, Doug Barton wrote= : > Christoph Mallon wrote: >> Doug Barton wrote: >>> Garrett Wollman wrote: >>>> <>>> said: >>>> >>>>> It's great, thank!! >>>>> I believe that our xterm entry was modified not to clear screen whe= n >>>>> applications such as less(1) are terminated. Are there any chance = to >>>>> back to the behavior? >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't understand why people put up with the unspeakably obnoxious >>>> "alternate screen" behavior. Please don't tell me someone actually >>>> thinks it's *useful*. >>> >>> I actually liked having the remnants of whatever I was looking at in >>> $PAGER left behind on the screen, and would appreciate it if someone >>> could tell me how to restore that locally. >> >> %echo $LESS >> -X > > Yeah, I should have been more clear. I am aware of that solution for > less, but I also dislike this behavior for vi, etc. Basically, I want > to know what to twiddle to get the old behavior back. > > > Doug (but thanks anyway ...) :) > Maybe this? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2009-July/009102.html Ronald.