From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 20:02:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4178016A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:02:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from guri.is.scarlet.be (guri.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF36E43D3F for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:02:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beni.brinckman@scarlet.be) Received: from (ip-213-49-107-35.dsl.scarlet.be [213.49.107.35]) by guri.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id j2AK2QC16748; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:02:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:01:51 +0100 From: beni.brinckman@scarlet.be To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20050310210151.11fde150@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050307191721.GB5094@gravitas.thebunker.net> References: <200503061201.01469.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> <20050307191721.GB5094@gravitas.thebunker.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing p5-File-Temp from portversions upgrade list ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:02:32 -0000 On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:17:21 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:00:55PM +0100, FreeBsdBeni wrote: > > > So, how do I get the p5-File-Temp out of the portversion-list of > > files that need to be upgraded ? > > Since File::Temp is bart of the base perl now, your best bet is to: > > # pkg_delete -f p5-File-Temp > # pkgdb -F > # portupgrade -f lang/perl5.8 The pkg_delete told me that I didn't had such a package installed (yes I got the Capitals right). The pkgdb worked fine, just like the portupgrade of perl5.8. But a portversion afterwards still showed that p5-File-Temp needed to be upgraded... Guess I'll have to live with an unexisting package that needs to be upgraded then. Thx for the tips ! Beni.