From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 05:56:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7958A16A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:56:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40C443FBD for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:56:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20031121135627015001j8vbe>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:56:27 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A6E373A; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:56:26 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3FBB85F7.8010602@lek.ru> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 21 Nov 2003 08:56:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3FBB85F7.8010602@lek.ru> Message-ID: <44n0apj051.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: "Ilya V. Serov" Subject: Re: Question abt arp in 5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:56:28 -0000 "Ilya V. Serov" writes: > I've got a curious thing with FBS 5.1-RELEASE, concerning arp > requests/reply. I have a LAN, connected to Internet through CISCO > router. Recently I had to move one ip address inside my LAN from a 4.8 > box to a 5.1 box without a reboot (ifconfig ...). After this I had > discovered that CISCO continue sending packets to old MAC address (to > 4.8). After an investigation of the problem I discovered, thet CISCO > had not "forgotten" the old MAC. If ip is being moved from 4.8 box to > 4.8 box this effect fanishes. > Did anyone get similar problems? Is it a feature or a bug in 5.1, > or I don't understand something? It *should* be normal behaviour. The other devices on the Ethernet shouldn't update their ARP listings until the box sends out some kind of broadcast packet. If it doesn't do so, the other devices will time out their ARP mappings in 5 minutes.