Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:03:45 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/shm Message-ID: <m3smpimcxq.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20030707154235.GD71703@dan.emsphone.com> (Dan Nelson's message of "Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:42:35 -0500") References: <3F08B199.3050409@comcast.net> <3F08B79B.2040805@gmx.net> <20030707001443.GA1530@invisible-island.net> <20030707002347.GC5141@aurema.com> <20030706203440.D89894@vhost101.his.com> <3F08C4FD.8010107@gmx.net> <m3el12lf91.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <3F09663D.9020200@gmx.net> <20030707134031.GG10021@merlin.emma.line.org> <20030707154235.GD71703@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> writes: > There is already a functional non-procfs implementation that has been > around long before procps top: groupsys top 3.5b12 (i.e. the top that > all other non-Linux systems use) compiles fine on even the newest Linux > kernels with the attached patch. Apparently, groupsys top 3.5b12 with the patch you attached still opens /proc on Linux. It _is_ faster, but I don't see why it's claimed non-procfs. Any magic dances to perform during the build? Feel free to respond off-list. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3smpimcxq.fsf>