From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 08:56:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3667B16A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:56:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E255E43D2D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:56:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:57:18 -0600 Message-ID: <40460E57.7000105@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:56:55 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <20040303082443.5804a947.ebudd@grokking.org> <20040303132914.GC11526@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040303090009.4d09fbbd.ebudd@grokking.org> <20040303163040.GB32905@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040303163040.GB32905@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2004 16:57:18.0734 (UTC) FILETIME=[967A2AE0:01C40140] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:56:58 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: >On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: > > > >>I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was >>still "officially supported" and every other advisory up to this one has >>been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for >>example. So am I to assume then that as of this week 5.1R is no longer >>"officially supported"? >> >> > > > > >You might want to ask on freebsd-security@ if 5.1-R is still a >supported security fix branch. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > From that list: "I intend to do so as time allows." - Jacques Vidrine HTH, Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P.