From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 02:38:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB04616A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:38:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.euronet.nl (smtp1.euronet.nl [194.134.35.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A3343D3F for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:38:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213]) by smtp1.euronet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F528671D0; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:38:50 +0100 (MET) From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Wanadoo Nederland B.V. To: Sheldon Hearn Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:38:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031213145040.GE13737@starjuice.net> <200312150810.22127.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20031215093619.GM13737@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <20031215093619.GM13737@starjuice.net> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312151138.55354.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Debugging options for tomcat41ctl X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:38:57 -0000 The only reason for this is that an rc.d script cannot be made suid. Ernst On maandag 15 december 2003 10:36, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2003/12/15 08:10), Ernst de Haan wrote: > > > Is there a way to enable debugging on the Tomcat instance started by > > > tomcat41ctl, or do I need to start Tomcat manually for that? > > > > You need to start it manually. The daemonctl program is in desperate > > need of improvement :=\ > > I've asked this before but don't remember getting a response: what > problem does the daemonctl program solve that pay for its limitations > over a regular rc.d shell script? > > I'm not attacked the script; it seems to work very well. I'm just > wondering why we can't just use a rc.d script. I first wondered when > using the jboss port, which also uses daemonctl. I just used a slightly > modified version of the rc.d script distributed with jboss and it seemed > to work fine. > > Ciao, > Sheldon.