From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 18:52:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD62C16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from citi.umich.edu (citi.umich.edu [141.211.133.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B147D43D2D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:52:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu) Received: from citi.umich.edu (dsl093-001-248.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.1.248]) by citi.umich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABB620B6C; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:52:41 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, openafs-devel@openafs.org From: Jim Rees In-Reply-To: Garance A Drosihn, Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:42:08 EST Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:52:41 -0500 Sender: rees@citi.umich.edu Message-Id: <20040316025241.CABB620B6C@citi.umich.edu> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] OpenAFS for FreeBSD 5.2 patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:52:42 -0000 I also have a freebsd-sparc64 machine. Should I give this openafs a try on that, or should I just stick with the i386 platform? It won't work until someone hooks up the proper lwp and does other config hacking. But it would be a good project for someone.