From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 00:25:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E345D97C; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F0934F; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id p10so6290026pdj.13; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:25:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jCz3+TUhIZnVymZRxkGHE9CaOONHqp1V2xB+JuF5mrs=; b=P3s8ir+5jUY2H47yCmNBZDUHDcC05AeMAMaXMzymELQK/NEV5H38EXNnUDO8x06fcI x1EVM/ZnqRUpRieIaAYWOmh0MxMhPNKZhhvfisxCsYuLtJy14dKDeOmdAyz8N4jUko/Z bq8oqGTgzs0DSk+MoywDV/8nUFhqv5dmUchhoWY+Yn9xhcnSaP7YvmayNpn9LLdGbyQl YYN8SFUjHXeXO8xGU4+FZOIg7AMeoEBmEyEaQwxe+bbO+OEl5GFvQpBpDYJHEtNB0DbU 89Duve43V5h6zb3LQt/NaC82BXH4ygaQzLIpeTe/nwQ9BqzQMw2b+S0HSYqPURSAj+f3 NXRQ== X-Received: by 10.70.42.208 with SMTP id q16mr1528727pdl.56.1421195132063; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:25:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (ppp59-167-128-11.static.internode.on.net. [59.167.128.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wt4sm18214669pab.4.2015.01.13.16.25.29 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:25:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <54B5B774.3020109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:25:24 +1100 From: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sbruno@freebsd.org, mva@freebsd.org, sson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: python waf bypasses _MAKE_JOBS number References: <54AC74E0.4050404@ignoranthack.me> <20150107072132.GA1050@medusa.sysfault.org> <54AD5BB9.2060701@ignoranthack.me> <1420653060968-5979111.post@n5.nabble.com> <20150109183334.Horde.DDLUOEFT2TrMFUcP63h_9Q1@webmail.df.eu> <54B0154B.80801@ignoranthack.me> <54B019C1.7090704@ignoranthack.me> <20150110002908.Horde.QrB60C0_PExk9ypkaJhFiA1@webmail.df.eu> <54B578E5.2010003@ignoranthack.me> In-Reply-To: <54B578E5.2010003@ignoranthack.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Antoine Brodin , python@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:25:33 -0000 On 14/01/2015 6:58 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > For now, I'm going to start looking into Makefile patches to setup the > correct variables so that waf doesn't assume we want number of CPU's > detected. > Might this be a good candidate for USE_PYTHON= waf feature for some consistency and minimised duplication in waf-based Python Ports?