Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:25:24 +1100 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: sbruno@freebsd.org, mva@freebsd.org, sson@freebsd.org Cc: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: python waf bypasses _MAKE_JOBS number Message-ID: <54B5B774.3020109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54B578E5.2010003@ignoranthack.me> References: <54AC74E0.4050404@ignoranthack.me> <20150107072132.GA1050@medusa.sysfault.org> <54AD5BB9.2060701@ignoranthack.me> <1420653060968-5979111.post@n5.nabble.com> <20150109183334.Horde.DDLUOEFT2TrMFUcP63h_9Q1@webmail.df.eu> <54B0154B.80801@ignoranthack.me> <CAALwa8=q-3ZAQRxkgU0_EJL4qHYoA2%2BtE-=9%2BODSVi-uHeP2Aw@mail.gmail.com> <54B019C1.7090704@ignoranthack.me> <20150110002908.Horde.QrB60C0_PExk9ypkaJhFiA1@webmail.df.eu> <54B578E5.2010003@ignoranthack.me>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/01/2015 6:58 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > For now, I'm going to start looking into Makefile patches to setup the > correct variables so that waf doesn't assume we want number of CPU's > detected. > Might this be a good candidate for USE_PYTHON= waf feature for some consistency and minimised duplication in waf-based Python Ports?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B5B774.3020109>