From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 11:50:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4E416A585 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5643D67 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4HBoHQ9085931 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4HBoHG9085930; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:17 GMT Message-Id: <200605171150.k4HBoHG9085930@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= Cc: Subject: Re: ports/97152: [new ports] emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage[23] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/97152; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, gkovesdan@t-hosting.hu Cc: Subject: Re: ports/97152: [new ports] emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage[23] Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:48:04 +0200 The ia64 architecture should be removed from ONLY_FOR_ARCHS before adding these ports, because I was wrong when I thought that ia64 has Linuxulator as well. Gabor Kovesdan