From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 22 15:54:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E1116A405 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944B913C45D for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0MFsJ2h099205; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:54:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:36:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <45AF925C.9050104@aei.mpg.de> <20070121205107.GF66756@uriah.heep.sax.de> <45B3E82D.2050207@root.org> In-Reply-To: <45B3E82D.2050207@root.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701220936.15638.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:54:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/2477/Mon Jan 22 10:10:05 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Joerg Wunsch Subject: Re: ACPI problems on HP Compaq nx6325 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:54:27 -0000 On Sunday 21 January 2007 17:24, Nate Lawson wrote: > Joerg Wunsch wrote: > > As Nate Lawson wrote: > > > >>> Have a look at PR i386/104678, and the patches referenced there. > >>> Using these patches, my nx6325 works reasonably well. ... > > > >> I looked at this and the solution should be "don't use anything > >> other than C1". > > > > Nothing else is supported on the nx6325 anyway, only C1. So that's > > certainly not the problem here. > > If nothing other than C1 is supported, I am almost certain the patch > doesn't affect anything. So what problem were you seeing and how is it > changed? These CPUs turn off the lapic timer in C1. -- John Baldwin