From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 21:28:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E5116A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:28:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4973743D55; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:28:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k14LSWA7048337; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:28:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 83118-07-3; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:28:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k14LDwle047349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:13:58 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) id k14LDv06006484; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:28:42 -0000 --FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "M. Warner Losh" writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav writes: > > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more > > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive > > > coverage analysis. > > Then it should be the default, standard flag. >=20 > I wish. Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which > systematically opposes this kind of change. >=20 What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and usually compile successfully? :-) I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing =66rom the kernel builds now. Perhaps it's still needed for some platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure... Can be easily checked with "make universe". Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD5RkVqRfpzJluFF4RAklIAJ0QEzi5JZ0aMyURweB0fqXGYOxlewCfUAbp /mt4rOFebq7i3OSK+OjWhyo= =fTUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8--