From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 20 19:13:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.ham.muohio.edu (dragon.ham.muohio.edu [134.53.141.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8379114D7F; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 19:13:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost) by dragon.ham.muohio.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10258; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:10:04 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: dragon.ham.muohio.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:10:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Howard X-Sender: howardjp@dragon.ham.muohio.edu To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Fumerola , Bruce Evans Subject: Re: getopt.h In-Reply-To: <19991020221007.A90211@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > Well I searched the mailinglists and didn't really got further than > discovering that unistd.h goes a little way to provide functionality > which getopt.h from glibc provides. And seeing that a question of Bill > early 1999 never got answered correctly. I cc:'d Bruce on this since I > value his stylistic mindset on this issue. Speaking of which, are we ever going to get a getopt_long()? NetBSD's compiles and runs fine if you hack out your own getopt.h, which looks a whole lot like the one at the end of the original message. :) Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message