From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 17 13:51:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rigel.pucrs.br (rigel.pucrs.br [200.132.10.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D6537B422 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from apolli@pucrs.br) Received: from aegis.pucrs.br (aegis.pucrs.br [200.132.13.12]) by rigel.pucrs.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA03549 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 17:48:48 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from apolli@pucrs.br) Message-Id: <200105172048.RAA03549@rigel.pucrs.br> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:49:44 -0300 From: Alexandre Polli II To: BSD list Subject: IPfw or IPf X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE; i386) Organization: PUCRS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings gentleman; I am on the brink of putting my whole network of about three thousand clients behind a NAT/IPFW FreeBSD gateway. However, someone here raised the idea of using ipfilter instead of ipfirewall. I've checked the homesite of ipf and the ML archives, and it seems that the ipf project is half dead. Question is: did anyone here put both to the trial by fire? Cheers; Alex -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message