From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Dec 11 14:25:04 1996
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA14011
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA13998
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:25:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0vXx4u-0004Y6-00; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:24:36 -0700
To: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
Subject: Re: Risk of having bpf0? (was URGENT: Packet sniffer found on my system) 
Cc: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>, FREEBSD-SECURITY-L <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:16:58 +0200."
		<199612110716.JAA01999@silver.sms.fi> 
References: <199612110716.JAA01999@silver.sms.fi>  <9612101452.AA21942@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.95.961210215417.9494P-100000@nap.io.org> 
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:24:36 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0vXx4u-0004Y6-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199612110716.JAA01999@silver.sms.fi> Petri Helenius writes:
: I think one consideration here is that to run some of the desired
: functionality, like dhcpd, you need to have them.

FWIW, rarpd also needs to have bpf enabled as well, or it doesn't work
either.  It would be nice if that wasn't the case, but it is :-(.

Warner