From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Apr 29 21:14:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA02142 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yarrina.connect.com.au (yarrina.connect.com.au [192.189.54.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA01980 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aardvark.apana.org.au (root@aardvark.apana.org.au [203.12.237.49]) by yarrina.connect.com.au with ESMTP id OAA00975 (8.8.5/IDA-1.6); Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:07:06 +1000 (EST) Received: from solsbury-hill.home (dialup-28.aardvark.apana.org.au [203.12.237.58]) by aardvark.apana.org.au (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA20360; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:06:27 +1000 Received: from solsbury-hill.home (localhost.home [127.0.0.1]) by solsbury-hill.home (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA04544; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:06:17 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <199704300406.OAA04544@solsbury-hill.home> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96 From: Joel Sutton To: Tod Luginbuhl cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:10:24 -0400." <199704281510.LAA12638@SCIENCE-GUY.npt.nuwc.navy.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:06:17 +1000 Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > My experience has been that FreeBSD (stable) is far more stable > than Windows 3.1 and is more stable than Win95. FreeBSD almost never > crashes at home (and it never crashes on my portable or my system at > work), where as Windows 3.1 crashed daily and it seems Win95 crashes > atleast weekly (if not more) for me on my home system (please factor > in 2 children ages 7 and 4.5 into the picture). My Win95 machine is a 386 and it crashes daily, if I'm lucky. Usually is crashes more. :-> Such is life I guess. I wanted to save my Pentium for FreeBSD... :-> Cheers, Joel...