From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 17 19:40:38 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F376816A402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD52913C459
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: (qmail 9538 invoked from network); 17 May 2007 19:40:37 -0000
Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org)
	([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; 17 May 2007 19:40:37 -0000
Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id C914C2843A; Thu, 17 May 2007 15:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu>
References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <464B1D6A.1040809@samsco.org>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0705160849530.8669@libra.sfsu.edu>
	<44tzubr4u6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0705170901570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu>
	<44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:40:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> (KAYVEN
	RIESE's message of "Thu\, 17 May 2007 11\:37\:15 -0700 \(PDT\)")
Message-ID: <44fy5vi6h7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:40:38 -0000

KAYVEN  RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes:

> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Please don't top-post.
>>
>> KAYVEN  RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes:
>>
>>> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade
>>> comamnd, just verifying
>>
>> Yes.  Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on
>> pango being unable to use the new version.
>>
>> Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any
>> other issues you need to take special action for at the same time.
>>
>
> this guy seems to disagree
>
> jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and
> reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error
> messages from xfce.
>
> If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed
> either.

That's true.  I seem to have missed wherever it was that you said that
the portupgrade of pango had failed.