Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:45:35 -0300 From: William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com> To: glarkin@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org>, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r322338 - head/www/dojo Message-ID: <CAHtVNLOcc_zoT1vFQsQJ_RpPCQKp0e8WdF1KALZQVD3cTrSQ9A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51D759D1.50303@FreeBSD.org> References: <201307051537.r65Fb0Wa078537@svn.freebsd.org> <51D752B0.7040607@FreeBSD.org> <CAHtVNLMfy_Cuiw3fRdNK66i8-rUotSC%2B1oZCXiRSXuymaA3HNQ@mail.gmail.com> <51D759D1.50303@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Greg Larkin <glarkin@freebsd.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/5/13 7:36 PM, William Grzybowski wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Greg Larkin <glarkin@freebsd.org> >> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 7/5/13 11:37 AM, William Grzybowski wrote: >>>> Author: wg Date: Fri Jul 5 15:37:00 2013 New Revision: 322338 >>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/322338 >>>> >>>> Log: www/dojo: update to 1.9.1 >>>> >>>> - Update to 1.9.1 - Take maintainership >>>> >>>> PR: ports/179682 Submitted by: wg (myself) >>>> Approved by: maintainer (timeout) >>>> >>>> Modified: head/www/dojo/Makefile head/www/dojo/distinfo >>>> head/www/dojo/pkg-plist >>>> >>> [...] >>> >>> William, >>> >>> Thank you for the PR and the subsequent commit. However, I >>> believe it is good form in the FreeBSD porter's community to >>> contact the current maintainer prior to assuming maintainership >>> yourself. >>> >>> I am OK with this change, but please do follow that guideline in >>> the future for any other port you are interested in. >> >> I asked for the maintainership in a PR, which has timed out. I will >> be happy to give it back to you. >> >> >> -- > > No, I said I am OK with your change. However, unless I am mistaken, I > don't think putting a maintainership request in a PR is enough. It > should be followed up with a direct email. If you then get no > response to that for a period of time, then it's OK to take > maintainership explicitly. > > If a PR is timing out, it's unlikely that the maintainer saw the contents. > > No harm done, just clarifying my interpretation of the community > customs. I'll let others chime in if I am incorrect. Ok, I've asked about the procedure for such cases and I've been told I should write a PR asking for maintainership, as I did for other ports. I'm sorry if this is not the official procedure. I'll personally email the maintainers from now on. Thank you for the clarification. -- William Grzybowski ------------------------------------------ Curitiba/PR - Brasil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHtVNLOcc_zoT1vFQsQJ_RpPCQKp0e8WdF1KALZQVD3cTrSQ9A>