From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 19 12:38:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA20486
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:38:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA20356;
          Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA07238; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:34:31 -0800 (PST)
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.dk.tfs.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org, asami@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CVS repository pushed off the FreeBSD CD distribution... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Mar 1997 21:12:02 +0100."
             <14067.858802322@critter.dk.tfs.com> 
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 12:34:31 -0800
Message-ID: <7234.858803671@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >Despite what all the hackers may think, I feel that the ports/packages
> >still represent better value than the CVS repository so there's no
> >question in my mind about which bits get precedence, the question
> >being more one of "what do we do now for the CVS repository fans?"
> 
> More SNAP cd's ?

If I don't have to put ports or packages on the SNAP CDs, sure! :-)
Remember, the SNAPs are only a single CD (and priced $10 less than the
others).

Would people prefer the SNAPs to become full CDs?  They'd probably
have to go up to the $39.95/$25.94 (sub) price if I had to do 2 of
them each time, but I could make one the SNAP/package CD and the other
the unpacked CVS tree, unpacked src and unpacked ports (I'd have room
for all).

Would there be interest in something like that?

					Jordan