From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 12:53:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4B116F61C for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC5113C4AC for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 23907 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2007 12:18:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.167.15]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Feb 2007 12:18:40 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:18:33 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: "Atz-Soft" Message-ID: <20070221131833.50b537fb@localhost> In-Reply-To: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> References: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:00 -0000 --Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Atz-Soft" wrote: > I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situatio= n: >=20 > The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) > any later version. > The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on > FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. > And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports > collection. Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who first uses a free license and then objects to people distributing his program in compliance with that license? I would assume that most authors are either glad that someone considers their program worthy enough to create a port for it, or just don't care. > So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? Usually the author isn't asked for his opinion, if the license allows distribution, it's assumed that the author is ok with it. I don't know if there ever was a situation where the author of a GPL'ed program asked to remove it from the ports collection again, but in my opinion such requests should be ignored. If the author doesn't want distribution he shouldn't use a license that allows it. Fabian --Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF3DieBYqIVf93VJ0RAnzMAJ4lmp1qdHskKdcYZKxluwMFZAsDKgCff+ky aRf3z55YnGRXaR1gfyRABwc= =FzN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC--