Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 03:42:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 283584] irc/eggdrop: Fails to build due to tcl.h header location Message-ID: <bug-283584-7788-iooa6AnEow@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-283584-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-283584-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D283584 --- Comment #15 from ek@purplehat.org --- (In reply to Chris Petrik from comment #12) Well, dang. I completely understand the frustration of the "Linux Syndrome"= and I can also relate. 'Tis a shame! I suppose my main concern or question is, why does it build from the ports = tree perfectly fine when simply removing the @${REINPLACE_CMD} for the tcl.h file (no USE_GCC=3Dyes needed) but it fails to build in Poudriere without that replacement and vice-versa? I took a quick look through my /etc/make.conf file and see nothing that sho= uld change anything regarding a simple build of irc/eggdrop, but that certainly doesn't mean anything when it comes to this, apparently. I mix ports and packages all the time for large builds that aren't actually needed downstream from this build server (like GCC, LLVM, RUST, etc...) so = I'm fine with keeping GCC updated via pkg only. I'm really just trying to understand why I can build and run eggdrop just fine without GCC if the port finds the tcl.h header file successfully (I hope I'm making sense? Maybe I'm missing something?) Again, I really appreciate everyone's very responsive effort on this. Cheer= s! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-283584-7788-iooa6AnEow>