From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri May 16 13:05:08 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA16704
          for isp-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 13:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA16687
          for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 16 May 1997 13:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA25139; Fri, 16 May 1997 16:05:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 16:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
To: Blaine Minazzi <bminazzi@denverweb.net>
cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: radius, usr total control and freebsd
In-Reply-To: <337C7B8B.58DCB2C3@denverweb.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970516160358.14789B-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 16 May 1997, Blaine Minazzi wrote:

> Steve wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > Ultimately, of course, there will be solutions which are compatible
> > > with both, but do you really want to make the investment now?
> > >
> > 
> > I have 12 competitors in the area who are.
> 
> So, how exactly are they doing it?

Most of my competitors are hostile ones because we have the bulk of market
share in this area.

In any event, I got it worked out.  I want all ports straight PPP only, so
setting up with the merit radius port of 2.2 (but I compiled it on 2.1)
works just fine!  Thanx for all the feedback!