From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 13:55:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8FA16A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:55:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.67.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C69143D48; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:55:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CnH3v-000KH0-3T; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:55:27 +0000 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:55:27 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Xin LI Message-ID: <20050108135526.GQ49329@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Xin LI , Gerald Heinig , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, kamalp@acm.org, Robert Ryan , tjr@FreeBSD.org References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de> <20050107091004.83732.qmail@web52710.mail.yahoo.com> <20050107092110.GG49329@submonkey.net> <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="85DVAmvoahDzaF7X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: Gerald Heinig cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: kamalp@acm.org cc: Robert Ryan cc: tjr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:55:37 -0000 --85DVAmvoahDzaF7X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:10:06PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My > > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeB= SD. >=20 > I guess that this might worth investigating: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html >=20 > (Unfortuantelly, neither tjr@ nor I have touched our patchsets recently. > A most recent snapshot of the two patchsets are here: >=20 > http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid.diff > http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid-tjr.diff) >=20 > Most of the work was to catch up with Aug 2004's -CURRENT, but it might > be easier to bring them up-to-date instead of working from the very origi= nal > patches =3D-) Looks great. Any reason why neither has been committed? Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --85DVAmvoahDzaF7X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3+ZOocfcwTS3JF8RAmRSAJ0ZmOwRax/EvRl4dxLbIEzw89O6QACfUGWe 8TZzjp2zViQjjnF9V679B1Y= =oZHS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --85DVAmvoahDzaF7X--